CrossWord

Big Tech has been under increased measures to mitigate the risks for concerning practices that have shaped their power and control over the minds of consumers. Particularly, one company is under a Microscope, as they aim to Soften the barriers to privacy and levels of independence that consumers deserve.

They have particular conflicts with platforms they oversee, detrimental impact amongst users of their products and services, and deception of their charitable efforts described in Scholastic Status. This company continues their curation of very concerning practices and predatory influence over institutions, talent, and the various networks they invade.

As consumers become more aware of the troubling tactics that evolve out their influence and intentional agendas (which are known to have increasingly predatory impact), the removal and limited use of their services and platforms can progress for increased measures to balance against such manipulation.

This plethora of platforms with power gained over time tend to display increased predatory activity infiltrates and covers a wide range of industries, and therefore individuals. This ranges from young minors hooked on video games, to students at various institutions, to working professionals, and also amongst elite businesses where their services have been used.

The urgency to limit the amount of people that interact with their technologies is significant for safety and structure amidst the agendas and deception with their efforts. Such examples of their deceptive influence over various tech tools include: social networking & social media platforms, apps, email hosting, chats, devices, consoles, software, talent they employ, and talent they invest in.

Provided context will outline the concerning impact this company has over individuals, institutions, and culture. From over-analyzing to agendas, their influence has empowered their stalking, suppression of competition, and intentional seduction ♥️ of individuals their elite personnel aim to prey upon. 😯

Research regarding  some of their reward recipients and characteristics surrounding the corrupt and creepy nature of their company, creator, and applauded culture (of agendas) is included to describe such detriment.

Led through decades by Bill, such a complicated individual has no problem praising his priorities of his brain being highly functional, and therefore is aware of his activity and impact from his widespread influence, invasions and investments.

He did not hesitate or fear getting the bill, surrounding the desirable hot dogs that he had the time and eagerness to stick around for. This appears to be among his priority cravings and infatuations of service. Many viewers of such imagery noted his head down, essentially drooling at the delicious, scrumptious, long and thick meat

As such a notable man invests his time, attention, and resources to stand for his beloved meat, such awareness to his interests and isolated events outside of his power held over platforms can be noted. With the prompted impulse to attract this man that (known to look into files) to particular food, many can uncover more on what he likes to look at in his downtime. 

Such physical attraction to a particular preference of his taste, has distinct characteristics to his craving. The style of the meat (Moist and warm),  the shape (long, round tip), and such a public appearance of what showcasing he prefers within his mouth can be noted. 

His observations (beyond his priorities in what he likes to swallow), can further prompt a consensus that he is open to observing the people within such a public environment. A stand (serving his long, thick meat) is not one of a more confined, developed, and secure facility, but one where a presence is expected. A man of such prominence and power would be familiar with the risks of such a location, but seemingly further confident with the rewards of such a love to observe particular people. If the meat in the buns isn't enough, the many (males) in attendance would certainly catch his eye as well. 

With such power contained over the services such a figure oversees, the many concentrations of leadership bring context to their culture his company(s) define. The tendencies of prying in, is consistent across many layers of what they aid, authorize, analyze, and in more growing cases admire

Given the power to infiltrate, invade, and investigate the endeavors of professionals, such resources can also be applied to influence the environments of individuals and prospects they watch closely. 

The particular patterns of such leadership can shape the collective characters they influence, to be molded under the promoted and praised culture they are defining. This company and charitable foundation has been shown (in a research case scenario) to support crossdressing.

With such context as described in Scholastic Status, detailing carefully selected candidates that this company (and known creator) chooses to provides for (preys upon), there are perceptions that come along with their practices. 

As such chosen people promote this founder's name and associated activity in public platforms, the assessment of active agendas and appraised practices can be linked in this correlation. 

Such large amounts capital injection has contributed to the surrounding the activity amongst these recipients display. The promoted practices of their company and culture have increasing concerns. It can come across that, Bill puts the Word out and despite women's attire, weiners may come out. 😮


manipulation of platforms & Manipulation of preferences

As this particular company is known to identify and target respective participants of their platforms, they can monitor the activity to cause real-time results.

This company can manipulate the dates, on their Word software should they feel entitled or motivated to subject particular devices and users to restrictions. 

The same restrictions, banning, spontaneous and timely updates for their software(s) and services can be directly applied to impact the recipient of what they monitor and they can then provide resources and influence actions to succeed on the chosen methods or agendas. 

Given the tools and technologies that uncover so much on data, and the known power and manipulation they have, such activity can be also applied to the minds of individuals, and sought individuals that curate the culture they intend to define and dictate.

With the extensive employees, talent, businesses, and individuals that are influenced by their services, they can expedite their concentrated efforts and plans in deceptive, discrete ways.

From the direct people they influence, through algorithms or more direct activity, various discoveries can lead to dialogue or distinct data that they can monitor, manage, and manipulate.

Therefore, given their control in manipulation, many cannot rule out their intentional planting of philosophies and promotion of agendas with their platforms and power.

If they can manipulate the dates of projects in software, they can easily manipulate the dating preferences of sponsored and scouted talent.

This predatory regime is accomplished through rewards and resources, reaffirming specific behavior and beliefs, relentless eavesdropping and ritualistic engagements that cater to chosen characters they support.

Such practices can lead to the promotion and publicizing of material and messages this founder influences.

Such impact on individuals, with the investigation over various institutions can influence a culture and include particularly perceived fetishes and preferences of the creator of such a powerful company.

Sponsoring the sexually ambiguious

The company known support the bills to young talent exploring education and open the gates to these ambitious desires. The troubles come when such influencers over these individuals have agendas to their perceived human acquisitions.

In a research scenario, this company rewarded a recipient that chose to attend a very prestigious university. 

The perception is known surrounding these recipients of such funds. As scholars are rewareded, it can be perceived various incentives to promote their funder and organization in public and across public platforms.

These same public platforms are significant, when there are limited interaction prior to meeting some of the people that are destined to be in educational environments. 

Partial details may be discovered for people entering these environments, to anticipate relationships and networking. Therefore, standout reward recipients can sometimes be discovered across these same platforms they promote such a powerful name and founder.

This company is known to place their judgement on individuals that they observe that use their services, not completely under their control.

Perception and instant messaging can be noted surrounding their company as well, alongside the talent they choose to invest in. They intentionally invest in such talent early on, with awareness to their stories, public promotion, and presentation.

In a research scenario, one particular recipient prior to officially attending this university, (but having been accepted and a recipient of such funds) was discovered to be promoting crossdressing

This male (tall) individual that was intentionally invested in by this company, showcased this praised crossdressing standard on their public profile. 

The individual can be seen smiling in a short skirt and short top alongside peers (even females) that were seemingly supporting this authorized attire (women's).

This presentation showcased in a public forum and promoted can be dated at a time where this young talent was more impressionable and exploring life, education, and relationships (which can be diverse in exploration). 

In general when coming across this seemingly coordinated content, it can can influence those that come across it. There may be concerns, added measures of awareness, acceptance, or engagement for those that anticipate being in the surroundings of such open individuals.

Many young people, entering such environments are further planted the perception that this is the preferred activity, that is awarded and applauded. This calculated conditioning for such characters can serve to shape culture, infiltrate colleges, and be empowered through capital (as Gates supplies it). 

With such tools and technology to analyze various characters very early on and their tendencies, a company can use, scale, and support these individuals to their causes and culture as they progress through life under their power.

These individuals have further perceived privileges to promote and invade lives. They have perks in comparison to others in such environments. They are proven to have less factors of stress, financial worries, and added time to contribute to these deceptive causes. Given particular crossdressing themes, this foundation and furthering through funds can be elevated given the structured support to increase their presence on these educational premises. 

These carefully chosen characters are funded, fed (meals that may include Gate's desirable meat), and followed along their route to finish school. They are monitored alongside their network, as they release the causes (agendas) they are supplied, and report back to Gates in the perceived organization style system of sponsoring. 

In the research scenario, the presentation of this praised recipient by Gates prompted immediate assumptions and awareness amongst the demographic this individual would be later interacting with. Speculation of their preferences took effect before an interaction, which is essentially the power Gates has when such intentional investment and action.

Additional patterns can be assessed from individuals that are under such investment, and given the time and resources dedicated to praising such a powerful name. Further invasive patterns can align with what many see across the power this company demonstrates aross their platforms.

stalking patterns & Showcasing prospects

The company (and creator) have a well-known perception that they want to look in on lives, conversations, campuses, companies, and consumers they take an interest to.

In some cases it can be for the suppression of competition, simple curiosity, stalking consumers, or in more appropriate perception amongst the founder and fetishes, scouting crushes.

The research scenario described the confusing foundation and promoted presentation of such an individual. In further brief tendencies and activity of the described individual over time, particular traits and practices stood out.

This individual did have perceived eavesdropping tendencies (audio of surrounding interactions). They had a tendency to want to save photos of individuals (male) surrounding them when simply executing tasks of photo capturing, as young people may do in such environments. 

(The perceived obsession of such a recipient however furthers the conditioning of such a company, founder, and the general influence Big Tech has on users and real-life predatory patterns)

In the described research, there was a particular lighthearted post on a public platform that may have gained a nice turnout of impressions amongst the demographic in that environment, but could also turn on the companies and creators of the company that look in on these lives.

In the simple post, one individual (Gates recipient) temporarily set a picture of a companion at that time as his profile picture. The imagery displayed a different individual and seemingly attractive male of a different culture featured in his male clothing with a smile. Beyond the smile, was the display of good body health and abs toned.

Such naive and unintentional posting for fun in such settings opened the featured subject of the image (and profile that posted it) to particular attention in the environment. 

Beyond this it is perceived to have gained attention, admiration, and attraction amongst the sponsor and stalkers that look in on these individuals and surrounding prospects.

As these powerful companies and company founders look in on lives (with their love to be attentive to particular meat), their admiration of such analyzing can lead to actions to further look in on what and who they desire.

These (Big Tech) sponsors and stalkers, have been known to make investments and acquisitions for additional data and ability to look in on particular demographics.

With this particular company and a creator opening the gates to make room ( surely not groom) in such institutions for their chosen characters, their crushes can also be discovered and desired within these demographics.

The bills pile in a predatory way, when they acquire to look in on these desired lives. There are troubling perception, and perverse implications that come along with their continual investigations and investments in a particular demographic. Beyond the intentions of eavesdropping, this company wanted more eyeballs on these campuses for the creator's eye-candy.

With GroupMe added to his bill, such a meat-loving master of services can scout out desirable candidates to group (groom) in his causes. As many of the sponsored students praise his name, he can see more direct in what shapes their impressionable brains and network of prospects.

It can be perceived by many that this founder may be turned on, as he trespasses on the details and extensive data from campuses (GroupMe, Socials, Files in  Software) to corporate data (LinkedIn, Emails, Software) with many tools being under his control. 

With such power and perceived interests, he can cause his characters, tools and technology to turn against his desired prospects.  With known obsession to control, he is perceived to prefer complete and isolated access amidst his attention and admiration to these prospects, and known appreciation for his desirable meat.



A connection & a Conspiracy

Should the cute candidates and crushes (that Bill desires), bring such unique imagery and unforced interactions in an organic way to platforms that are seemingly professional, the elite manipulators and masters of tech-first culture may be jealous.

While LinkedIn promotes the use of the word connection amongst the many networks and users of this platform, the tendencies and targeted demographic of the main company are under a larger microscope. With the controlling founder supporting schools, scholars, and perceived to be scouting crushes, some may be subject to consequences if the founder wants a deeper connection.

Should a particular individual share good content and spark engagement amongst an actual ex or person with you have shared a real or romantic connection, there are elevated emotions amongst the eavesdroppers that have invested in curating agendas, and coercing those they admire.

As these elite (meat-loving) onlookers connect campuses, candidates, and competitors to the characters (cross-dressing) and (curious) culture they influence, they can dedicate resources to rival individuals that aren't a complete victim to it.

Despite (with this company and Big Tech) the measures to manipulate members of different campuses, communities, and companies, select talent may have their own way and privileges of navigating opportunities when appropriate.

The crush on these desired candidates, can swiftly turn to conspiring and criticism when these Gate(s) -keeping groomers aren't having their way with prospects in their refined culture or ambitions for a romantic companion.

The same subjects of photos that had public appeal in campus environments, may sustain such appeal in different images that can impact in other platforms as well. 

The criticism can come when their crushes aren't confined to their control and culture. However, should such individuals interact with other professionals in respectable professions and discover content more concerning, these creators don't mind, nor conspire.

Particularly, in more professional engagements, and the public presentation that uncovers a man holding up a stuffed animal as their main photo (on a seemingly more professional platform), this is allowed and applauded. This is despite a potential creepy consensus that could also be formed with the evolution of their culture.

This company and collapsing culture can be linked in the preferences and promotion perceived with the founder and controller of these promoted causes.  

With the tools to influence many lives (and the files of productivity surrounding these lives), the causes they are increasingly furthering are increasingly more concerning. 

This company can operate alongside a team of companions (Big Tech and Institutions) to target those they desire ♥️, with detrimental impact on these selected candidates to such a regime, as well as detrimental impact on the declining culture, with many young minds subject to such agendas.