ReKindle
As Big Tech faces continued trials in their efforts to abuse their power with troubling practices, the concerns regarding leadership and what the culture they curate become increasingly present and problematic.
One particular fulfillment giant, has been known to take their services to many territories and gain control over consumers, competition, and even the contributors that engage with their powerful company.
In Keying In and Seasonal Slavery, particular insight is provided to the outline different tactics and risks associated with this company.
As this company scales and grows their influence in the world of content, they serve far beyond the original services of their company. The patterns this company display, in their response to peers in their industry (and peers of leaders affiliated with their company) present deliberate problems that come along with their practices.
The coordinated changes this company and known leadership create in response to the relationships shaping their business and surrounding consumers set a compromised culture in commerce. They further contribute to their culture of conquering control.
With their control as priority to the many pivots, platforms, and purchases this company influences and over time, the surrounding agendas, detriment, and limitations many users, consumers, professionals, and companies experience are subject to increase.
However, this company continues to boost their influence, imitation, and deceptive investment.With critical changes shaping the evolution of their enterprise, many can recognize this company's response to relationships in their industries. These industries had well known releases. This company pivoted for intentional reshaping to push their rollouts, and to gain further access and data within residences.
Some of this company's their signature releases such as the Kindle are seemingly reminiscent and in response to rollouts in the tech space. This speaks to their awareness and necessity to gain acceptance and relationships with peers in this space.
The dynamic of their device developments, is similar to that of many relationships. Such rekindling features the activity of making intentional adjustments in response to what one has experienced, desires, and dedicates efforts to align with.
With a known focus of fulfillment taking many turns in their routes of control in other areas, their practices and platforms also present problems. This company has a big deviation from their original service that was largely themed on activity such as reading, with healthy concentration amongst consumers.
The impact of this company's platforms and products dictate very unhealthy circumstances for many consumers, and surrounding businesses that interact with their company. By tailoring so often to the releases and relationships of their peer-companies, such rollouts are detrimental to the users that experience the many risks of such technolgoy, tracking, and targeting.
Further, this company and known leadership can further their agendas, with their culture they influence and define. The many layers to their businesses that scale, have continually negative layers to the impressions with the agendas they sell.
Numerous appearances for noteriety & appeal
The founder of this company, has been known in recent years to be more engaged in public show-casings, with his presence at premieres surrounding the prime products (that come along with their signature subscription).
The presence of this founder and a smile can often be seen at these public appearances their company promotes. With the re-branding of the smile on vehicles, they are promoting a particular smile in select environments (Towards accessing your home).
The smile at these premieres with this founder, can be seen far more, than in environments surrounding the perceived services (slavery), requiring intense privacy for these fulfillment spaces.
With many users having been granted the perks of viewing content as they scaled services, there was initial impressions left on their rollout. Initially, there was a consensus of decent to mediocre content offered on their prime content service (as per the subscription). They have increased wealth and influence to attract better pictures to their platforms.
Such pivoting and promotion to such a platform, when coupled with the public presentation of the founder can highlight the perceived intentions of their dictation in response to peers.
The kindle device, (capturing the consumer dopamine of touching, screens and the company's stalking) was a big concentration of this founder.
This founder and his company was intentional on hooking all users on such devices despite the variety of purposes they could then plant, promote, and repurpose with their expanding enterprise and power quest over platforms dictates. It could further be placed within the premises, of the properties and significant spaces these users occupied.
In a research example, such context was provided amongst an individual that interacted with an ex-employee at the origin of the Kindle. The individual interacted with the former employee that described how this fulfillment giant responded to trends in tech. The individual in the research scenario, uncovered that this former employee worked closely on such a device with the founder (behind the scenes and behind the service they offered).
This is a critical device that could display content for consumers. This device further boosted the reliance on this company and growing consumers. It added more addictive elements to the way in which users tap along, as they are tracked and analyzed. It positioned this fulfillment company as a peer, to other companies far more familiar with devices and such devices being the core of many of these companies. (Ex. Apple or those described in MarketPlay)
The individual in the research example uncovered crucial insight to the intentions of capturing consumers with this device. This individual of such research gained insight at an institution beyond the territories of this large company's origins.
However, this individual shares similar connections to this prosperous nation where AMZ originated, and also ties and talent that shapes the world of content (prompting perceived targeting).
In more recent years, the founder appears publicly, but seemingly lacking the appeal in such environments. Many do not equate this founder as the centerpiece of content, imagery, and originator of stories that move culture and cinemas.
However, it does not stop his efforts to be seen. (Should particular people with such appeal and activity in the world of content scale organically and authentically , such a company and known conspirers are capable of coordinating against these individuals.)
This founder has continued to seemingly smile more on carpets for appeal, as their smile-branding and creeps in couriers track orders and people in their communities. They may share orders internally to stalk, or externally with conspiring efforts agsinst those they target. Nevertheless, this founder has more concentrations of their outings being shared to increase their public notoriety.
With a perceived lazy eye, this doesn't stop their company from lurking enterprises and individuals that rival their rollouts. They are intentional on being featured in press for their projects, as they apply pressure to faces with more appeal than theirs.
This company succeeded in a creation to be amongst peers of a space in one sector, (as seen with the Kindle). There are perceived ambitions and agendas surrounding the faces of this fulfillment company.
As the founder flaunts in the public eye with these notable public appearances, they aim to seize complete power and define the peers in other industries that their capital, company, and coordination can influence.
charitable donations
This company is known to make considerable but calculated donations to people they are perceived to want to dictate.
In recent years, their company and associated founder has been known to donate to widespread talent. This can range from talent linked to institutions, but further can be seen amongst talent that have some form of public influence.
Therefore, their scholars that contribute to their workforce are not the only group subject to their aiding and perceived agendas.
The stars of shows that have impacted culture, may be also granted charitable funds, to assist in momentum and surrounding activity with the ambitions this company has in attracting many to their platforms and products.
As such charitable causes can be seen as commendable, it can be strategic and deceptive with a company, founder, and their known intentions of expanding influence in other industries.
Given their ability to assign and appoint respective talent to be apart of their platforms, projects, or progress in shaping culture, such charitable contributions are to be perceived with much more intentionality and calculated conditioning.
As themed-content surrounding day-to-day lives and homes have already shaped culture, this company that looks in on everyday lives can aim to brand alongside such content. Their contributions to such casted contributors of this content is significant to their foreva long list of agendas.
Consumers and supporters of such content and contributors, can then be more tolerant and subconsciously impressed with this company, and reliant on their devices and services. With the increasing risks and antitrust probe problems surrounding this company, users can adjust to their reliance. However, such calculated contributions, can rekindle consumers to further engage.
This company however has agendas with this aiding, as they are known to peek into lives, homes, and patrol these premises on a daily basis. As these consumers engage, their company can have greater means to invade these very homes.
Press on the Web, & paths to work
This company and its founder, are increasingly seen throughout the press, with featured models and featured movies.
The founder has grown such ambitions to showcase his products, people, and projects in these environments, as they aim to attract more visuals and viewers to their platform.
Beyond their continual expansion, they are seemingly aiming to dictate the reliance on their platforms as the pathway to showcasing talent, while they capitalize in such a confined creation.
This company, expanded their influence on spaces to detail the knowledge surrounding content, with their direct deal and acquisition of IMDB.
Such a resource and database, when curated under their control can become a completely different mechanism for their dictation, (which tends to come with their dollars over time).
They further added a subscription service to this platform (another sector beyond their original service). Such subsription services, would then be promoted to participants of the content space to showcase and connect with talent. All of which can be analyzed, monitored and monetized by this powerful company.
Beyond investing in institutional talent, curating them to their corporate workforce and agendas, they now aim to direct and curate talent in areas of content. Such talent can become conditioned to fork out their capital to this company's dictation.
Such measures of monetizing in a platform that can be deceptively seen as "research", can be seen as their way of controlling both the information surrounding the reporting on content, as well as their role in overseeing the chain of progress for another competitive space.
The continual rollouts of this company can be unhelpful to the residuals, role security, and privacy concerns surrounding particular talent, as many just pay to be monitored by this mega-company.
Their faces of the company however are increasingly seen in the press, blogs, with widespread coverage as their ambitions beyond their core services continue.
As such movie features are presented on press-runs, so are the impressions left on consumers that witness the figures and faces associated to these platforms, projects, in surrounding press.
The founding faces, associated network, peers and the pivoting features on these faces that are promoted, are surely noted. Popular relationships that evolve surrounding one of the most influential companies, are covered in the media landscape.
This company's ambitions to increase technologies to fulfill services can be widely seen. Perceived increase in testosterone in the features of such promoted faces can be also be seen by many throughout these press-runs and agendas.
As consumers and creators perceive their powerful platforms as the place to go, these consumers can model after such perceived models, with their faces increasingly seen on red-carpets, outings, and blogs.
As this company increases popularity of their products, they increase patterns many follow, for their chance of opportunity or engagement in the spaces this company influences.
These Big Tech companies like to position themselves as the authority figures and faces that define commerce and culture. Therefore their promoted activity influence that spark cultural adjustments in response to who and what they rollout. Many do so with conditioning to align with the products, people, and practices they release.
As this company brings in residuals with increased expansion, they add risks surrounding their intentional efforts.
By consumers being aware of these patterns, they can have more context to consider when engaging or relying upon this company and associated platforms.
As this consumer awareness increases, alongside the appropriate balancing of power in active markets (as this company aims to possess complete power), better commerce and consumer experiences are likely in markets they influence.