Given the dollars dedicated to delivering their services to particular demographics (largely themed for those with dependents), many would believe they would factor in particular risks they pose in the common structure at many of their chains.

As they market to the families and the many individuals that feast and fellowship in their locations, such a common design for this particular chain with a huge fortune is perceived as problematic given they can do much better.

This common tactic in these territories is in contrast to the domestic practices that have far more evaluating involved. This is given the familiarity with this franchise's promotion, practices, and they better ensure these profits are far more accommodating to those targeted by their marketing. 

Domestically, in their headquartered land, there appears to be more efforts and appropriate involvement of development regulators, authorities, city planners, and businesses to monitor the design that is set to serve their targeted demographics.

With this franchise being known for child-luring internationally, in their home territories(even in high-traffic locations), more upward designs for those served to sit and try and enjoy a meal on these premises.

As they aim to be such a high-traffic hamburger hotspot, they can apply the appropriate capital to support the consequences of their concentrated customers and promoted causes they support.

Space and regulation can differ in markets internationally, but even with other businesses of a similar design, they do not market nearly as targeted to such demographics or dictate and deploy the same level and lucrative dollars to data-enticing services.

For this franchise this includes: a complex of apps, delivery bags, burger wrappings, marketing festivities with designated areas that appear to have taken over by delivery personnel in their many chains in international territories. Often, the customers they've attracting appear to be secondary to service, and are sent down at many of the swamped and limited space locations (lowcations). 

Such practices (by design), have impact on the consumer experience. The well-known chaos results in many ways given the tight spots, and the children's interactions are risky given the deceptive experiences in these high-traffic spaces stemming from their showcased clowns and supported causes.

They continue to have a tech-based concentration, with the apps ready to order and scan, but printing far limited within these premises. This can be largely seen as intentional, and certainly strategic cost-cutting. 

By this design in the simplest way of assessing the architecture, less people can be seated below. The foundation of buildings are usually below, with the natural limits on what can be stored when digging into the soil of the earth. For this franchise, they do have the funds to design to their desired demographics. 

Typical businesses that build and design for downward directing handling high volume following traffic for the "marketed experiences" manage things differently. They properly invest in venues and services to host such incredible traffic seen across the experience sectors (sports, events, etc). 

Consumers within this perceived intentional design layout are more than likely to not have phone "service" as they head deep below to the data dungeon. As phone service is apart of the core functionality and purpose of common smartphone devices, they are limited in the usage on these premises. 

Many are encouraged to connect to wifi, which is a perk but the dictation comes with definite disadvantages when considering the privacy sacrifices. 

Seen in their extensive chain of lowcations, but a common system is one that requires these customers to be data and digital-driven users. They are often encouraged to register, and provide extensive personal details, contact details, in order to browse. 

This company can then use this data of personalized details to stalk, sell, and target demographics, that have been strategically directed to such digital reliance.

Many of their foreign, yet family-invited lowcations can also have anyone pass through to make use of the bathrooms and urinals. 

These lowcations are sure to have digital kiosks, prioritizing their digital app codes and rewards scanning. As with their cost-cutting they are more opposed to review-codes many customers can validate such discomfort in their experience. 

Particularly, these codes are more driven by reading the receipts that this franchises opposes as they cost-cut and seemingly encourage their staff to collect them, as they direct them to digital reliance. 

They appear to take to the schemes of marketed deals in apps, tech-driven printing companies (Ex. Snapfish, FreePrints) that seemingly duplicate apps to promote such deals and are opposed to the customers that make purchases with the advertised deal. Perhaps their staff are too slow to realize they marketed these deals, but are more concentrated on data snatching, opposed to delivering services. As with this fast-food company, such described schemes of the mentioned printing companies may have you stalked digitally and physically.

With the venues on such foreign soil, these cost-cutting measures lack the concept seen in their headquartered country with codes on receipts for the restrooms. This assists in the safety of customers and the many clown-behaving characters this franchise attracts, but fail to apply the resources to secure and serve these demographics.

So as the wifi doing wonders, its more possible the attracted children are exposed to more winners (Weiners). Not limited to the creeps cramped and welcomed inside, but those dicated by their digital rewards prompting engagement and dopamine to spin, scratch, and swipe away at their designed systems.

As many of these lowcations are apart of commercial premises that share with other brands, some on well-known high streets are hospitality companies (particularly this franchise conspires along with some).

As this hamburger hotspot hosts the attendants of customers they cater to, they could take to such hospitality standards in their design. 

Often, more reputable companies that deliver services are far better at actually being based within available space of hospitality venues, for the chance at leveled structure, appropriate seating that could improve their services.

This chain appears to love cramping consumers in, and creeping them out in the clowns they connect with, and attract on-site.

As hospitality companies have a variety of contributors that help their businesses, they are far more likely to be more attentive and aware of the contributors on-site. They have more care for this familiarity to those that contribute to the business, and the manner in which their behavior can impact guests and all serviced.

This fast-food franchise has appeared to be more in alliance with their tech-tactics than serving the audience they aim to analyze. Entering many of these foreign chains on paricular territories are filled with the helmets, bikes, and often (brown) bodies that add disccomfort to the desired customer.

Some are often seen mean mugging consumers as they enter with resentment, waiting around for their digital order outside, and taking up extensive space inside with boxes banging against customers. They contribute and fit right in to the culture of encouraged clownery, as many of these particular contributors may be immune to destructive chaos enabled from their origins, and fitting such an occupation they take for granted. They fit right in, while consumers squeeze to fit in such facilities. 

This fast-food franchise could take note from some of the hospitality businesses they share sites with, for the betterment of behavior and chance of biting into burgers if consumers dare to sit in such premises.

As ambulances u-turn to the long routes of victims from chaos that tends to reach these locations, seemingly due to the missed concentration of design and intentional dictation to troubling tactics, the appropriate sanctions apply.