This company scaled immeasurably to many devices and demographics across the world with their products and processors. 

The businesses, busy people, or simply browsing users on these devices made incredible use of their core services, for various needs ranging from corporate, college, criminal, creative, or simply collecting notes for their own private affairs or ideas.

This company and its creator has always felt entitled to any material that can be displayed in their software, as they shape culture and consumers with their lengthy and lucrative reign of influence.

Many are also uncovering what else such a company and their creator (curating curious culture) has also felt entitled to. Such a culture and investment in characters throughout environments where many use their services also display deeper motivations to the invasions that come alongside their investments.

Beyond their entitlement to material, this company and creator has perceived to feel entitled to program users to open orientations.They incorporate intentional branding with agendas, stemming from their complicated founder and core foundation.

The Microsoft Logo and icon is widely recognized from its powerful influence obtained after evolving out of a powerful nation. Many are aware of the prosperous nation and the talent originates from such a place. The symbolism widely expressed and recognized in a flag 🇺🇲.

This company's branding aligns with its perceived power and dominance of populations, they seemingly feel deserving of such depictions with perceived sybolism.

However, this company is far more branding with a particular culture with their colorful flag, seemingly depicted in their logo that aligns and projects this company's love towards that community.

The LGBT indications that are planted and promoted with this company, leave impressions on the many users and lives that interact with such services. From decades of shaping culture, the many consumers that have been using these services to do themselves proud for their progress in their respective lives, are also simultaneously programmed with a bit more pride.

Such festivities aligned with the culture of their colorful flag branding, gives further insight to their practices and pride for being far more invasive in the lives of users with time. These festivities in such communities championing colorful flags have such individuals more exposed. These participants demonstrate their activity, content, and expressions far more free, revealing, with outward sharing of their activity.

This company projects and plants this philosophy of expressive culture amongst many consumers that use their services in a private and confidential capacity. As this company and its creator expects entitlement to what their users do, they further aim to eavesdrop with material. 

This is material used, created, or noted uniquely and independently of any personal participation of such a predatory company's talent or involvement. However, given the software is under their colorful flagship, every user is a slave to their snooping and revealing culture as they exploit data with direct targeting.

The culture this company curates,  is seemingly aiming to align and attract many to their curious agendas. While users come across their products, people, and platforms they are conditioned to value the colorful outlook in a conditioned community.

This branding has always been there from their start, and the ongoing agendas and promoted activity can be seen in more abundance with time. 

Strategic core foundational branding, with added concentrations to their business allow for greater understanding to the more concerning predatory plans that shape their perverted path of prospecting.

Such a company so powerful and successful in attracting many to their colorful branding and computer products, continued their ambitions and agendas.

As services on computers prompted many people to rely upon such products, extensive data was obtained by this company. As this company and its creator felt obliged to further snoop, this data and documenting was not enough.

The common senses used surrounding these foundational products were that of the eyes and fingers. This company could directly monitor activity across the devices.

 Users were familiar with scrolling, clicking, and typing to the set standards, rules, and design of these popular software products. 

The drafts and finished products that people engaged in took a bit more time. However, they are still various forms content, work, and communication that was shared across populations. 

Users are often typing and engaged in the software from the thoughts of their brains, or participation in activity within their environments. Users had not granted so much personal access beyond that on the software products. 

Projects, products, papers, presentations, and performance data could all be seen, exploited, and targeted by this company. Despite all this data (data they invade, manipulate, and exploit), their ambitions for deeper analyzing continued.

This company wanted more insight on the meaty and juicy topics behind the themes of material they snoop on, as well as the tone of voice and skin for the prospects of this company's and founder's liking.

In their more predatory priorities, their efforts of snooping can be elevated by reaching their grooming goals of stalking. They accomplish this prideful predatory milestone with enhanced access to more direct and daily data of their destined targets.

With their growing evolution of products that began to incorporate and advocate for more dialogue (ex. video game consoles), they could peek in on prospects and prey. Such data could allow them to push their agendas as people play. Such troubling risks are discussed in LookOut. 

As this company continued their quest for more data and details on demographics they desire to control and coerce, Skype was a quick purchase to penetrate the places containing their desired prospects. 

As this company made this acquisition of Skype, they accomplished the ability to analyze more activity.

This creator's calculated concentration of uncovering more on consumers in their chats and conversations was secured with Skype.

Further, he could follow along the ongoing fellowship of prospects he's a fan of, and which cute candidates he may fancy (aroused as he analyzes).

Data on many demographics exploded with this service addition. Such data access also exploded for this company's greed and gain, in earlier periods as computers evolved  and scaled. Their products were placed and eavesdropped on written, typed, and numerical content, projects, and various subject matter.

Many Big Tech companies (those they conspire and communicate with) gained extensive data in dialogue technology. They have since abused, misused, all that prompted the AntiTrust problems they each face with elevated consequences in current times. 

This particular company held dominance over documented activity within devices for decades and grew substantial wealth. Their tactics at a time so crucial in tools transferring information, align with their strategy of transferring their concentration. They aim to be fast and direct with agendas that can be placed on populations.

With Skype, this company could more directly invade the dialogue and pick up on trends, culture, and characteristics of consumers across different communities. Many could then be more directly targeted to their ongoing agendas that have evolved with their continual acquisitions and analyzing over many environments.

As this company gained more access to dialogue, they could understand the different things people discuss. The ways in which users approach peers, topics they are interested in, and components of trust surrounding their network.

This company could pick up far more information (far more valuable to even more quantitative data) than what was stagnant in their core products. However, the quantity and quality of conversations and data are each incredibly significant to what this company could capture. 

With direct data on the discussions, demeanor, dialogue, and depiction of the characters in their natural or even professional environments, they could better understand different consumers. With such understanding, such a calculated and coordinating company(s), could also aim to craft the characters they want to influence society.

The strategies to redefine, alter, or curate culture to their chosen and preferred characteristics and traits could be more managed, monitored, and manipulated with this enhanced access on active conversations. 

Particular knowledge that these corporate environments may fail to understand or identify with, could also be uncovered with this technology, through analyzing participants on such a tool.

People participate and participated in more private environments with comfort in their confined spaces, and chosen social colleagues. The distinction in delivery, detail, and display of such environments occurred through this technology. This company could increase and match material within products, to the places and people using them, while they peek in such private dialogue.

This company could also have their added data on families, faces, features, or even fear, with extensive emotions more directly expressed within this technology.

The love for stalking  grew stronger for this founder as he prompted the the faces (likely of fellows) he finds attractive, more easily talking. 

With such a tool promoted and growing popular amongst consumers, the data to directly tailor to these consumer (cute) prospects was obtained. 

Additionally, with their investment across institutions and influence over many environments, the strategic promptings and dialogue over demographics he aimed to influence with agendas could more easily be executed. 

Whether home environments, or highly elite ones, this company was collecting crucial data, to use for their curious demonstrations. 

As this company gained extensive data, traffic, and insight with this tool, their perceived power to groom also propelled.

For younger users, this company did not have to tailor their thoughts to dissect a carefully drafted essay. They could just eavesdrop directly on conversations in their call logs, content preferences, communities, campuses, or career journeys.

For widespread users, the same direct access enabled the added curiosity and classification of distinct users. Such distinct users are also perceived candidates, to the many areas of activity and opportunity this company's services interact with.

With the perceived predatory nature of this company, these candidates can be scouted for a variety of reasons, including romantic. When such a powerful colorful brand takes control over conversations, these candidates are more under command.

With greater understanding to what these particular candidates take interest in, this company can prompt the distinct people and proposals for concerning dialogue and demonstrations they may be forced in, subject to, and therefore engage in. 

This company can pick up on additional hobbies, habits, and home touches in the background of these documented dialogue and visual conversations. They can then prompt participation of assigned activity, with simple tweaks that leave impressions on their desired individuals.

They may know that a particular candidate likes a particular type of activity certain and they may prompt their agendas to be displayed or discussed to leave an intentional impression.

Through repetition, and roles defined, more predatory people can directly interact with their candidates of choice. This company can implement agendas to appeal to these candidates with all they have uncovered about their interests, practices, goals, peers, and voice.

With the founder fetishes perceived, amongst the hot dogs and hotmail (hot males) stalked for a in-depth long investigation to such data, the cultural shifts to monitoring and manipulation can be drawn from such leadership.  

The ongoing shift to snoop and stalk personal data, have greater concerns with the predatory results stemming from this company.The tendencies of their founder, foundation of branding (colorful flag), and their investments (people and products) consistently present problems.

Many of consumers or candidates can be scouted for perverted desires. As these devices no longer typed, and began to ring, so too did the perceived romantic ring of an operation to scout (seduce) candidates and crushes of their liking.

This founder known to like the tip of thick meat, but he didn't need many tips in a perceived pursuit of prospects that can be more easily invaded, through their conversations. 

If such candidates were out of reach, such tools allowed this company to understand their prospects and preferred type, and others they could mold, condition, and teach. 

As consumers understand more about this company's described safe journey of branding aligned to agendas that appeal and promote their curated culture, the risks of their operations are far more revealed. Many can further highlight the obsession of this company's evolving concentrations (personal and curious), and what has resulted from their stalking and investment.

As the environments this company influences increase awareness to the compromised culture negatively impacting consumers, better efforts to hinder their continual detriment and limited engagement to these services can occur.