NotifiGaytions
As Big Tech continues to face consequences and scrutiny for various breaches in trust, growing concerns continue with the ongoing agendas associated to their brands and intentional activity.
A well known Googly-eyed company that is under the parent company of Alphabet has been known to control a considerable amount of data that flows through their products and the devices that use them.
With their influence throughout the internet in a variety of services, their growing tendencies to stalk and snoop in on consumers is well known. Beyond the perceived privacy invasions that come along with their influence and investments, greater concerns are sparked surrounding the sexual preferences promoted throughout their products and services.
This company is increasingly living up to the connotations associated to the parent company brand name of Alphabet. Many refer to a community aligned with the lgbt community (a growing, expanding and strong community) as the alphabet community
This company is increasingly growing and expanding its services, while dictating, designing, and deploying a variety of agendas that many perceive to be in alignment with the alphabet community.
With the many tools they have to track and target particular users, such coordinated and calculated causes that can prompt engagement. Their emphasis on seemingly sexual messaging aims to attract many users to the alphabet community.
Their transition to more direct alphabet community branding has been noted in recent years as they scale to new areas and territories with their intentional causes they want consumers to support (allies of their agenda). The colorful branding has always been present for this company, attracting many to their open culture of curiosity that they promote. Recent changes in their branding has been more direct, showcasing a big colorful G for their services.
This big colorful G, promoted in simplicity signals to the sassy, sexual symbolism they are selling and subjecting consumers to. This branding (very bold and big) catches the eyes of their targeted demographics, to begin associating this tech brand, with elements of glam 💅.
Google is a term that is a bit longer to process, and it often leaves impressions associated to their search engine (known to stalk), or their layers of services prompting caution amongst consumers familiar with their brand.
The shortening and colorful branding of their G, is one that catches attention and it can alter preferences of attraction to their alphabet culture. This in itself is a notification to the users and consumers becoming far more technology hooked. These are targeted to be fascinated with such sexual symbolism associated to their services.
The big colorful G, in the eyes of many can be likely represent Gay. With their branding amongst the many busy lives they stalk, in highly dense areas, it is very likely their services are even read as that.
G pay, is an example of one of the services they are aiming to seize more control over consumers. The dangers of this is discussed in Gadgets Performing. Beyond the dangers of users using this service, the deceptive nature to their sexual strategy has concerns. Positioning their big large G above the smaller font of pay, can be easily interpreted and read as gay.
They position this promoted predatory poster and pictures of the G, where busy consumers tap swiftly but get a glance. They are therefore intentionally prompted to read this company's showcased branding of Gay, whenever they get the chance.
The predatory symbolism of their showcased services will stand out amongst the demographics they look to attract to their culture. They have the tools to track many users already. Their branding has incredible impact digitally and more increasingly, physically.
The impressions of attracting users to their alarming activity has been very impactful as it is, and their alphabet culture flourishes. However, when their eavesdropping elite leaders want to prompt intentional engagement, they are more calculated in the tricks to successfully convert particular consumers to their alphabet culture.
They can do incredible and intentional targeting, to ensure people engage in their agendas. With their dominance over devices (as discussed in MarketPlay) they can signal such symbolism through these devices. They have dedicated dollars and time to deploy their messages across devices.
Such power in a predatory way, will reach consumers for awareness and their aim to appeal. With their prompting of notifications, their agendas have sparked concerns to the common gay messaging they proudly send as they stalk targets. (🏳️🌈They have something special for you 💜👀)
One may switch on their device and be prompted with a notifiGaytion. The notifiGaytions that are increasingly sent by this company, are very deceptive and detrimental to many users not wishing to be so conditioned and lured into their culture.
Many users are becoming more aware of the attacks to attract and bring appeal to their alphabet culture (that arouses their leaders). With the growing Antitrust Probe measures to monitor this company, the appropriate balance of powers to counter their causes and problematic culture can occur.
Many are ready to turn the page, for less predatory activity that comes with this company's products as they promote agendas while aiming to further stalk purchases.
Context will highlight the dangers of their practices in such perverted presentation. Through increased knowledge of their promoted activity, many users can continue to selectively engage in their services becoming far more predatory and sexual.
App agendas
This company is increasingly demonstrating agendas that are assigned by their affluent leaders, looking to lure consumers to their promoted culture and causes.
These agendas have been proven to take place across their various apps and the influence they have over devices and the apps that funnel through their dominance over stores and devices.
These described apps, can reference the many powerful applications users engage in for their own purposes, as this company ensures to prompt predatory presentation in such activity. (One could also link apps to the known predatory appearances, their employees showcase drag to young students)
Users are becoming more disturbed and disrupted with such luring invitations as they aim to concentrate on more productive material. Users may be on their device as they relax, research, communicate, check various forms of information, enjoy content, or navigate such devices to their own accord however they choose.
Devices have many capabilities and purposes each user can define to their own use. The various apps that are downloaded can be for leisure, productivity, enjoyment, exploring, simple use on a one-off basis or for a prolonged basis.
Big Tech overall has felt and presumed extreme levels of entitlement to the activity of users. Big Tech predatory lurking ranges from those that operate powerful apps, to those that control many of the devices that use them.
Users should in many ways be allowed to use devices and explore as they can, without being subject to the extensive stalking. Particular apps, browsers, and the many layers of technology can be difficult for many users to navigate as it is. Traffic and data can lead to many unrequested or unintended digital destinations, as these circumstances come with the clicks and flaws of technology as it is.
These companies are so curious about users and they aim to define them through their lustful love to look on 👀 with seemingly no limitations.
Concerns grow as they continue to dictate their desired agendas amongst users, and subject them to these agendas while users explore basic functions aligned with their autonomy and activity when using their device.
This company targets particular users they identify, in hopes of luring them to one day identify with their alphabet community.
As this company gained control on devices (deceptive and underreported), they can send out their sexual symbols through notifications.
This is beyond that which they do in targeting to users through ads, personalized data (they pull and prompt amongst users), or the listening in and showcasing personal activity for intimidation against their users.
They can be far more free and direct in their fabrication of legitimate and necessary content, to convey their messages luring particular users to their predatory content. They can prompt and present this at any point they feel empowered to, and force a user to see their sexual symbolism in a notification.
Hence, such a corrupt and coordinated cause has the classification of a NotifiGaytion.
This company has the ability to do this through apps. With such influence on devices they can do so without the device having connectivity or service.
Such control, ensures that users cater to these causes. Such efforts are guaranteed to break their concentration. Users do not even have to open the app these notifiGaytions are delivered, but are disrupted.
Such altering of their concentration curates these consumers to investigate their agendas. These sexual messages, then spark awareness and acceptance to their chosen, curious content.
This company further knows extensive data and details on every demographic they stalk, and are intentional on redirecting the sexual preferences of particular users, in a predatory way.
Their company personnel already knows so much information all about the attention span, yet they drag along these prompted and promoted messages to interrupt active purposes of users.
The users' thoughts are then turned to the tactical symbolism they promote, while the elite predators are turned on in their ability to attract the targets to their alphabet community causes.
As users know how more about these prompted messages can disrupt them, they can be aware of the algorithm or assigned attacks with agendas.
Users subject to these attacks do not need to lift a finger, tap, or swipe to be sent these sexual messages beyond their control. With such control of a rollout by the elite in this alphabet company, their efforts to bombard their agendas have reached forced predatory measures. This sparks extreme concerns to their company's practices against users.
This delivery of such detrimental displays, are now reaching levels of aggressive agendas, ones in which their users are vulnerable and often cannot resist.
Such power and predatory punishing they subject users to should have extreme consequences this company's abuse of their corrupt control.
Tech tease of temptation
As this company rages with such reckless predatory luring, they are intentional on showcasing such sexual imagery and messages by any means necessary.
They are far less concerned with the discomfort of their consumer, as long as they disrupt their concentration before these users can process their natural patterns on a device.
These notifiGaytions that are coordinated and unpredictable for consumers, are very damaging to many users that are forced to process this predatory portrayal of depictions sent by the sexually aroused stalkers that lead this company.
When they can execute such deceptive activity in a digital capacity, their dedicated causes can be more easily dismissed at the the detriment of their recipient.
They hold direct data and access such data to prey on particular lives they can investigate, research, and dig into the files held on devices. They review information that is personalized, some stored in drives and increasingly overhead through their snooping.
Such calculated patterns they pick up increase concern for their coordination. An extremist (as these company and their personnel increasingly are), would also know what material when placed in uncommon environments would prompt uneasiness amongst the eyeballs that come across it.
They can know so much about the individuals they prey upon and can therefore position their messages in non-traditional places for increased impact. This company's predators plot with an extremist style portrayal of content and messaging that forces attention.
This can be seen in a similar context to a tease of such revealing and sexual depictions that they know some particular users are not comfortable with, yet are still subject to it.
With the strategy that goes into their tempting, they are intending to gain users to engage in further activity associated to their agendas.
With the overt organizing to depict such demonstrations swiftly, such an act is comparable to activity in select environments and festivities.
These Big Tech companies are aligned with many causes they support. In SkypeType, it discussed particular festivities that can be associated to these companies' branding 🏳️🌈.
Someone going to an alphabet community cultured event or festivity, featuring such revealing content, may be uncomfortable if it is not their intended environment.
It is one thing to step into such a space or overt parade, but this company has the tools and time to ensure they bring their parade of a culture direct to users.
This is far more concerning to the impact it can have on users that do not request such activity, or even stumble upon it. These intended targets are hit with a carefully crafted notifiGaytion.
These users are teased, and some are tempted to engage. Many do engage, with the power of this company's rampaging and repetition. This company has therefore succeeded in gaining guys (or girls) at the prompting of their notifiGaytion.
Off guard = open to G
These prompted notifiGaytions are intended to catch their intentionally targeted users off guard.
They utilize their tactics and tools aiming to surprise their targets. When delivered in a digital capacity, they are luring their users to open some form of activity and discover more of such curated content in greater abundance.
Given the sudden response to such sexual messaging in their dedicated delivery mechanisms, such luring can mistakenly or intentionally prompt participation amongst users.
They collect additional data on what impressions, clicks, open-rates when prompted with their sexual messaging.
This company can gain additional comfort when succeeding in such calculated campaigns to excuse their erotic efforts amongst their chosen targets, and expand their agendas further to wider demographics.
They can also add elements of repetition to their romantic rollouts, to categorize particular consumers that may engage in their efforts.
Vulnerable users that click or tap to their tools, can simply be disrupted and explore an offer, deal, or update to something that could be interesting.
Other users could simply be prompted with information on something to alarm these particular consumers, to ensure they engage.
Given this company and their culture to be obsessed with data, particular demographics that engage with their prompted activity, can be documented as open to their distinct messaging.
As more users get more familiar with their messaging they are more tolerant to the tools they need to rely upon for their needs or interests. This company is calculated in combining their sexual messaging with commerce, cuisine, or cultural content that appeals to these distinct comsumers.
As they prompt more increasingly their notifiGaytions, they can classify as well as convert many consumers to being open to gayness.
They can repurpose messages planted in their promotion, to more direct content of the culture in their alphabet community. Here, is often where their targets transition occurs, after they have planted the seeds, to their sexual plots.
As this company tracks so much, they can reintroduce more romantic rhetoric that appealed in their original rollouts.They can coordinate users to explore more concerning content (as their services are popular for search, browsing, content, shopping).
Their predatory plot has then succeeded from the calculated tease, to the testing out of their material stemming from their sexual messaging.
The enterprise has then gained from their efforts to attract everyone to their agenda, and these users explore with enhanced engagement. (enGayment)
As their users then become more engaged, they are more hooked on the culture that was consistently promoted through their funnel of sexual messaging.
Such conversion often begins with their persistent prompting of a notifiGaytion.
This company furthers their agenda, while compromising the brands of contributors to their system. They can misrepresent actual activity in apps, while crafting sexual messages aimed to their targets. They damage not only these businesses often struggling against their monopoly (controlling money of competition), but also the minds of many consumers. (controlling minds of consumers)
Their promoted, prompted, perverted visuals they display increasingly take away from the authenticity of activity in devices they have gained extensive access to. They watch these users closely and wish these users convert to their concerning agendas, and have succeeded in doing so.
Their evolution to such concerning efforts is apart of their quest to completely conquer consumers and widespread companies. Their direct targeting to coerce many (men) and figures influencing culture and content, showcases their desperation to destroy any lingering of life unbound to their agendas.
Their predatory culture is increasing with ease and predatory intentions. When considering their enjoyment for the concoction of content that disrupts consumers with added discomfort, they are proud of the pride they contribute to amongst consumers.
Their leaderships's levels of intimate perspective pushed and promoted can be seen by the populations they influence. Many are under the impression their two founders have made the notifiGaytions they prompt amongst one another, available to unwanted consumers in the public they prey upon.
Their concentrations as a company are perceived to be apart of the greater plans for a predator-filled society. As the appropriate measures to balance their power obtained, greater privacy and peace amongst users can be gained.