From perceived trauma that is encouragingly televised through their technology (through personal threads, or posted thoughts), to the events that occur in different locations, they tend to love it.

As users interact with their platform, and particularly when presumingly troubling events (whether personal or concerning the public) of a given area, their engagement is boosted.

Particularly, this company (as with Big Tech) is known to love to analyze patterns. As they built such a platform to penetrate personal networks, they can aim to find a good grasp on the engagement patterns of an individual person as well as their peers. 

By doing so in such a confined network, as elements concerning tragedy occur, users' patterns and how they interact to ongoing activity in such a platform can be analyzed. 

Additionally, as they have an abundance of data linked to such occurrences, there is then a personalized activity pipeline. They encourage increased documentation, dialogue, and discovery of such activity in their platforms, and the effects on people can be significant. 

With the boosted engagement, they can then aim to better grasp, where you were, who you were with, and what you were doing in particular periods that can be mentally noted as significant. 

Such attraction through their algorithm to be active on in these tragic affairs, lets such powerful platforms gain (to their best ability) knowledge on the distinct nature of networks and their activity on significant occasions. 

As they encourage participation paired with these tragic moments, the more calculated and concerning measures occur with the tools they implement across their technology. 

They then are essentially address piercing. They can collect and curate for data on distinct demographics, their thoughts and tendencies, and target specifically whether through people or their algorithm's coordination.

They are able to see (essentially steal) data on the locations and connect to the respective individuals and the intentionally personalized network, within their surroundings at times more sensitive to their social lives and safety concerns. 

This grants the extensive data under their company and control for measures that users forget as time goes. However, this company executes and exploits should they feel necessary for any rollouts they release.

They are also able to essentially assess pain. They are curious and eager to understand the emotions, response, emojis, and best of all the perceived fears, that can be used for such predatory purposes should they find it necessary. 

These are from the personal threads to posts and even data linked to browsed and impressionable activity within their platform. 

As they scale in influence, interaction, and increasing the awareness to more triggering events, they design to this with time.

They create systems and create the changes for users to engage, specific to their environment with the data and dictations in response to studied and perceived emotions.

Many engage without hesitancy, and help along this company's added motivations to market more and more distinct to individuals and the data concerning their personal lives.

With increased emotions and environmental connections blended with the reliance on their platform to post and process such information, this further increases the digital dopamine and dictation they intentionally control from such designs.

As they incorporate such features, the other dopamine impacts come along with the heavy notifications, for increased discovery of such significant (emotionally-enticing) events and the responses from personalized peers.

The detrimental impacts to the increased reliance of digital addiction to awareness of these emotions and responses peak with these processes.

They have essentially managed to impact their users, a large percentage of consumers, and such conditioning contributes to a crisis curating culture. 

The added curiosity, and boosted tools to tap along to, have physical effects to the added stress and spectating that users and therefore people become drawn to, and dependent on. 

The face of the company, Mark is included in the words and design of such powerful and pushed features within this platform that has granted data linked to the emotions and environments of users. 

Users have been disrupted with homepage banners or boosted notifications of particular events or updates on tragedy, and encouraged to participate in a designed practice to showcase they are safe in a digital format, publicly.

The digital and public display can serve to replace in such circumstances an act, thought or method that would traditionally take place through personal dialogue. 

The broadcasting, allows for increased public engagement, drawing users to seemingly bond digitally in perceived trauma (many times the discovery) of such ongoing events. 

They then are simultaneously processing pain (of themselves or others) and participating in praiseworthy practices, (showcasing patterns) for the person in power of the platform, as they mark themselves safe. 

This can be troubling for many not so aware of the potential agendas of a seemingly ritualistic rollout. Many users participate in or are forced in such rituals with the design and dedicated tools to prompt participation.

Additionally, as users engage they are replacing their perception to personal property, with a digital platform. 

In such troubling circumstances, many people in reality are referencing their safety to a physical location, in the midst of escaping controversy. Through this tactical technique of this company, users are made to believe and participate in a culture where there safety is tied to digital engagement. 

Additionally, among the deeper concerns is that they can be made to not feel safe, or feel safe in a digitally influenced way distinct to this company and what they create. They are subject to the approval and promotion that comes with the mark of safety, on such a platform .

With such design and seemingly deceptive nature to the motivations of this movement, the company, its face (Mark), and reliance can be seen as miraculous.

These users are essentially being steered away from their processing of places to cope with their circumstances, and congregate within the confined technology that publicizes their awareness to promoted crisis, and praises the creator (of such a platform).

They are perceived to be apart of a pushed practice of crisis conditioning, that collects the data for their continual demonstrations they can orchestrate, and influence physical and digital events.

This dynamic amongst distinct demographics prompts a re-trained response to the rollout of tools this company can use and abuse with little concern for the heightened anxiety, adrenaline, and addiction to their engagement.

These users are essentially replacing reality within the confined digital networks, opposed to direct dialogue concerning nature and the physical world. Should it be a natural disaster or some tragedy, users' concentration has been shifted to reliance and playing their role in a movement created and encouraged by this company.

As this company influences such users to click, scroll, and tap along to the standards they aim to redefine, they are changing culture and are marketing their platforms, processes, and products as the better solution to stress and real experiences.

This service prompts users engage with such boosted emotions, showcase to peers content surrounding events they can digitally connect with. Many, when being strategically lured in such practices, feel afterwards that they have been served. 

The temporary satisfaction (as with many tech solutions) sparks users to coping with the conditions of their lives in their confined and coordinated creations. This can be very problematic when it is the complete reliance and boosted measures to ensure these emotions are triggered.

They can further feel after such engagement, as having been saved. As they mark with the dictation and curation of Mark, they are under a different dynamic of perceived control. 

This can be very concerning, if the motivations and reality of what such promotion and their tactics in reality behind the pushed practices amongst vulnerable consumers and times. 

As these digital events, are seemingly altered and manipulated through digital means to have physical impact, the monitoring continues. 

This company is known to monitor everything, and with increased efforts to explore emotions, they have so much more distinct data to dictate as a result of such engagement.

They can then uncover and project for widespread events, deliver their digital events and demonstrations for a much bigger grasp on specific demographics. 

They are further known to eavesdrop, with the lengthy apps and described services under their control. These plethora of platforms can sync in orchestrated ways alongside such emotionally-linked data they have dictated.

They have the power to create and coordinate campaigns as and when they feel necessary.  They have the tools and tendencies to connect their consumers to chosen candidates and causes they create.

With extensive data on companies, countries, chats, and even campuses, they can dictate the cultures that are now common, but can be catastrophic given the practices and effects of people impacted. 

As with this described feature, they can display experiences, and direct demonstrations that are perceived to be coercing communities and collecting unnecessary data from their calculated creations.